Honestly, when I saw my score paper, I was fully disappointed for my 70 scores. It was exactly a “C”! Such a bad score!!!

As what Mr. Manno wrote on the report, I expect my score would be very good, since Sue, Elsie, Maggie and I have making lots of efforts on our final project, but also Lydia also helped us. However, the result was not as good as I wished.

First of all, Mr. Manno told us that he had no clue what we were saying in the video sometimes. That’s true, because we didn’t add subtitles, and the volume was not very high. To solve this problem, we decided to add subtitles.

Moreover, personally, I think that we also need to improve our video definition.

Also, the video is too long and dull. It lasts for over 6 minutes, and a real advertisement shouldn’t take so long. The biggest problem must be the story.

Gladly, we got full point for our organization, which is 25 points since we have proper parts in our advertisement. But that was also the only part we did well.

According to Mr. Manno, our story was too boring. Especially, comparing with other advertisements, our story was way duller and longer. Our story was just a normal story-a bad student become a good student. Everyone knows that kind of story.

Fortunately, Mr. Manno gave us a chance to redo this final project based on the same product. We have found out our major problems, and then we need to solve them. Adding subtitles is not a big deal since it is just a technic problem. Now we are working on the resolutions for the story, as the story is the main problem. It needs to be more creative and more attracting.

Hopefully, we wish we could have a better score after redoing our final project.




Leave a Reply.